digg Chris

[Erin]

Okay, I did it:

http://digg.com/links/Major_webmaster_site_axes_top_contributor_without_ warning

digg it. :)

[stymiee]

Dugg :)

[Ben]

Dugg, kind of pointless, but I dugg it never the less :D You should have linked to the thread right here at WSP

[Vinnie]

digg sucks :p

[Chris]

If you wanna digg something, how bout this?

www.digg.com/design/How_to_Build_a_Successful_Website

Its funny though, one guy left a comment that its out of date because Google doesn't use meta tags. I believe I say the exact same thing (I've long been a crusader against the belief that google uses meta tags) so he musta just looked at the title list and saw meta tags and thought I was in favor of them.

[Tijmen]

Dugg both of them :)

[Ben]

I have dugg both of them as well

[charmedlover]

Dugg

[MaxS]

Dugg

[Bleys]

digg sucks :p

Almost as much as online widget-filled desktops. ;)

[Jon]

dugg!

[Vinnie]

Almost as much as online widget-filled desktops. ;)
Yes, almost :p

[Steelsun]

dugg both

[cyanide]

dugged

[ket]

dugg both.

[Erin]

Chris, there's a weird reference to:

http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200603/target_sued_for_refusing_to_make_their_website_acc essible/#comment9

in the digg. I don't get it. In the above post, the person admits he doesn't know what happened, but in the digg, the person says this is why.

[Chris]

Eh, Who knows. According to Sitepoint it isn't anything I said or did, and staff members have said far crazier things than that some blind guy suing a multibilliondollar corporation is just out for a payday.