PDA

View Full Version : Ping check



Westech
12-09-2005, 12:59 PM
If any of you have a couple of minutes to spare could you please ping these two IP addresses for me and paste in the results you get for each? Also, please tell me your general geographic location. I'm particularly interested in seeing how the ping times compare for people outside of the USA.

72.9.255.42
66.118.190.97

I'll go first to give an example of what I'm looking for:



C:\>ping 72.9.255.42

Pinging 72.9.255.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=49
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=49
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=49
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 72.9.255.42:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 32ms, Maximum = 37ms, Average = 34ms

C:\>ping 66.118.190.97

Pinging 66.118.190.97 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=51
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=51
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=51
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 66.118.190.97:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 43ms, Average = 40ms

C:\>

I'm in Oklahoma, USA.

Thanks!

moonshield
12-09-2005, 01:06 PM
Pinging 72.9.255.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=49
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=49
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=49
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 72.9.255.42:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 24ms, Maximum = 33ms, Average = 29ms


Pinging 66.118.190.97 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 66.118.190.97:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 72ms, Average = 55ms



Charlotte, USA

Masetek
12-09-2005, 03:42 PM
C:\>ping 72.9.255.42

Pinging 72.9.255.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=332ms TTL=54
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=251ms TTL=54
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=54
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=249ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 72.9.255.42:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 249ms, Maximum = 332ms, Average = 270ms

C:\>ping 66.118.190.97

Pinging 66.118.190.97 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=276ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=265ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=264ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 66.118.190.97:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 264ms, Maximum = 276ms, Average = 268ms

Adelaide, South Aust.

r2d2
12-09-2005, 04:17 PM
Pinging 72.9.255.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=53
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=53
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=53
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 72.9.255.42:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 112ms, Maximum = 114ms, Average = 112ms





Pinging 66.118.190.97 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=50
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=50
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=123ms TTL=50
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=123ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 66.118.190.97:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 121ms, Maximum = 123ms, Average = 122ms



UK

James
12-09-2005, 04:30 PM
C:\>ping 72.9.255.42

Pinging 72.9.255.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=48
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=48
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=48
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 72.9.255.42:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 102ms, Maximum = 129ms, Average = 110ms

C:\>ping 66.118.190.97

Pinging 66.118.190.97 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=123ms TTL=53
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=53
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=53
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 66.118.190.97:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 100ms, Maximum = 123ms, Average = 106ms
I'm in Western BC (a short distance east of Vancouver), Canada.

You're welcome!

Sean
12-09-2005, 04:56 PM
Pinging 72.9.255.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=47
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=47
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=47
Reply from 72.9.255.42: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 72.9.255.42:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 39ms, Average = 37ms

Pinging 66.118.190.97 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=52
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=52
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=52
Reply from 66.118.190.97: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 66.118.190.97:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 47ms, Maximum = 50ms, Average = 48ms

I'm in Northeast USA.

agua
12-09-2005, 09:39 PM
PING 72.9.255.42 (72.9.255.42): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 72.9.255.42: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=271.248 ms
64 bytes from 72.9.255.42: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=266.114 ms
64 bytes from 72.9.255.42: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=277.477 ms
64 bytes from 72.9.255.42: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=266.237 ms
64 bytes from 72.9.255.42: icmp_seq=4 ttl=47 time=281.295 ms
64 bytes from 72.9.255.42: icmp_seq=5 ttl=47 time=290.018 ms
64 bytes from 72.9.255.42: icmp_seq=6 ttl=47 time=272.071 ms
64 bytes from 72.9.255.42: icmp_seq=7 ttl=47 time=277.502 ms
64 bytes from 72.9.255.42: icmp_seq=8 ttl=47 time=271.682 ms
64 bytes from 72.9.255.42: icmp_seq=9 ttl=47 time=278.025 ms

--- 72.9.255.42 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 266.114/275.166/290.018 ms


PING 66.118.190.97 (66.118.190.97): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 66.118.190.97: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=280.54 ms
64 bytes from 66.118.190.97: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=278.522 ms
64 bytes from 66.118.190.97: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=291.949 ms
64 bytes from 66.118.190.97: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=297.516 ms
64 bytes from 66.118.190.97: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=282.102 ms
64 bytes from 66.118.190.97: icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=289.55 ms
64 bytes from 66.118.190.97: icmp_seq=6 ttl=48 time=296.921 ms
64 bytes from 66.118.190.97: icmp_seq=7 ttl=48 time=281.779 ms
64 bytes from 66.118.190.97: icmp_seq=8 ttl=48 time=289.752 ms
64 bytes from 66.118.190.97: icmp_seq=9 ttl=48 time=296.775 ms

--- 66.118.190.97 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 278.522/288.54/297.516 ms

Northern NSW, Aus